?

But wait, let's make sure it's a fair comparison: was the South gung ho about guns last time? Were guns a part of their way of life last time? I see. And yet they still lost? Huh. Interesting.

I'd be more inclined to believe that liberals are secretly plotting to overthrow capitalism and take away all guns if there were tons of popular anonymous boards circlejerking about it, the same way you see tons of white supremacy boards the moment you exit off the main highways of the internet. 

As it stands, it comes off more like people who do have extreme beliefs trying to project it onto the people who evidently don't. 

2018? Bullseye. Every single year going back until back to Reagan's first election? Bullseye. Reagan's second election? Bullseye.

I can see how people would be desperate to pretend that statistics is a liberal conspiracy, and I'll concede that maybe social stigma can hide outsider candidates the first time. But in case 2018 didn't clue you in, there's no logical or historical reason to think polls are inaccurate, especially the ones by Rasmussen and Fox that are giving similar results. 

How are we going to remember about Nazi Germany unless we have a holiday glorifying Hitler? BOOKS?! 

I've never been there, but I've heard so many reports from patriotic web sites on how terrible it is.

We know most gun deaths are from normal people in the heat of the moment, but let's ignore that, alalalala, what if we pretended that all gun crime is from cold-blooded professional assassins with unlimited time, resources, and resolve?

How can we possibly limit such a potent imaginary threat without AR-15s?

It must be those evil liberals. There's no other explanation.

(There's also more wealth and things to do, but shhh, I'm trying to feel like my small town is superior to New York City.)

It's almost like there's a difference between actual success and being obsessed with the idea of it.

Conversely, does anyone have a documented case of a liberal bringing up racism on an unrelated topic, like deregulation or climate change denial?

Didn't think so.

Just trying to get a feel for which one better represents a national election.

I'm starting to think that might not be the best criteria for predicting they won't lose.

#redtsunami2018

It's just death in reverse, people. Your brain turns off and your life is over. Your brain turns on and your life begins. Your life is one continuous stream of brain activity, starting around 25 weeks, give or take.

If you really thought life began at conception, you'd be calling cremation murder because it murders innocent still-living human cells.

If you really thought a heartbeat equals life, it'd be murder to take people off life support. Rich people would line up to stay on life support and "live" forever.

Let's be honest. We all know it's all about brain activity and some of us just pretend it's all murder to express their emotions toward the potential life that hasn't happened yet.

Oh shoot we already did that and there's no one in there until the third trimester. Sucks to suck I guess.

Let the record show that our predictions are always accurate and we'd never be so cowardly that we backpedal in the wake of being wrong.

When we entered, the GOP controlled both houses. I forgot what happened after.

Follow up question: which was the house that the entire nation voted on? That one seems more relevant for 2020

Follow up question: when you win the most recent election, is that a) a good sign, or b) a bad sign?

Og put seed in ground. Say food come from ground. Og stupid. If Og stay in one place, we lose buffalo.

Why liberal Og try to fix what not broken? If hungry, make sharper spear!