Should the LA Times Obama "Terrorist" video tape be released?

Don't know, don't care, tired of seeing this question every 15 minutes for 3 weeks.

It is funny how you hear this baseless allegation and IMMEDIATELY assume that it is true and also use the phrase "another terrorist SUPPORTED by Obama". You don't know if there is a tape. You don't know what is on the tape. You don't know where, the why or the anything about this so called dinner, yet you have already made up your mind about it. What is the need for you to see this ghost tape since you already seem to be a psychic and know what is on it? Do you also know who else was there if there was a "there"? For all we know, even if this is truth, this may have been an event that even hundreds of Republicans attended.

Use logic. The LA Times is not a small town circular. If they have a tape that contains any threatening information about an upcoming president they have an OBLIGATION to turn it over. They risk too much not to and their source would never be as important as their future as a prominent newspaper.

In addition, they already stated that there was nothing on the tape that was questionable.

The fact is, it seems you WANT to find out some sort of juicy dirt. It seems you would relish the thought of Obama actually BEING a terrorist. Have you ever asked yourself why that is? Truly? In your heart? No offense, but maybe it is not Obamas character that you should be examining.

I am sure you would think it highly deplorable if you were charged with a crime you never committed and the legal system had the same rush to judgement mindset you have.

It MUST be released!

We CAN get that tape but it will take us all. . .

I don’t know if there’s anything on that tape or not. I do know that we have a RIGHT to find out. Since the LA Times refuses to release it, we have little option but to force them to do so.

If you live in LA or subscribe to the LA Times, I strongly encourage you to:

a.) Cancel your subscription -- TODAY!

b.) Make sure the newspaper knows why you cancelled.

c.) Grab a copy of the paper and make sure that their advertisers, especially the big ones, know that you’ve cancelled and why.

d.) Make sure the newspaper knows you’re talking to their advertisers.

e.) If you can spare some time, picket/protest the LA Times offices.

f.) Encourage your friends, neighbors, coworkers, family, etc. to do the same.

g.) Copy this message to every BLOG you visit.

If we hit them hard enough on their bottom line, they WILL release the tape.

Barack Hussein Obama will lose this election ...he is way too far outside of the mainstream of America...in fact he is a 20 Year ideological disciple of Jeremiah Wright and his political views!

The L.A.Times is a private business, not a public entity. They have zero obligation to show anything to anyone.

Oh, about John Mccain's ties to that same "terrorist"?

http://mccombover.wordpress.com/2008/10/29/john-mc...

I think the scandal itself is enough.

When people say that McCain donated half a million to kalidi's cause,

they should really think about what that money was doing, like taking public opinion polls to try to figure out how to create Peace.

I noticed that the Times released a private tape of Gov. Schwarzenegger in 2006. They had no qualms about it then. Apparently, if you're a Dem with the Times, they will respect your wishes to make your candidate look good. If you're a Rep, they'll try to destroy you.

Khalidi is not a terrorist or member of the PLO.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rashid_Khalidi

Hell to the nah, I live near LA and I do not want anyone releasing that crazy **** because white republicans are going to start to blaming black people and start calling us terrorists, and anti-americans, and muslim etc.