Yahoo Answers is shutting down on 4 May 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
10 Answers
- tigeressLv 75 years ago
Yes, it is time to for more women to take charge. The men can't seem to get anything done. Hillary has the reputation of getting things done and she has the most foreign policy experience than any other candidate. In addition, she is married to one of most successful presidents in US history. It is like getting two for the price of one.
I am a progressive Liberal who loves Bernie Sanders. I would be overjoyed if he was president but, the reality is, like with Obama, I am not sure he could get anything done with this obstructionist congress. It would be a stalemate.
- Anonymous5 years ago
Yes. Only boneheads still are shocked at the idea of a vagina in the president's chair
- lestermountLv 75 years ago
there have been several women who could have been president if they were interested, so the answer is yes, however, Hillary is not qualified and being elected just because she is female is a terrible reason to vote for her.
- SocratesLv 75 years ago
Sure. It's just about finding one with the right political philosophy of governance, not the skirt (or pant suit).
- 5 years ago
That shouldn't be the issue. The issue is who is the best candidate. I think it's Bernie Sanders.
- Anonymous5 years ago
We are and have been. Elizabeth Dole could have run and won. Condy Rice maybe. Elizabeth Warren.
Just not HRC!
- Anonymous5 years ago
probably not...women r so objectified that they often do it to themselves...