Yahoo Answers is shutting down on 4 May 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
**** walk in Vancouver 2016? thoughts?
Okay so it was held on the 6th this month as indicated by heyevents.com.
Lauren Southern briefly described it in a post as "So the **** walk was pulling a BLM today and blocked hundreds of cars on the road and shut down major intersections while yelling "MASTURBATE EVERYWHERE." Achieving literally nothing in the process other than confusing the hell out of people on the street. They had a car participating in the walk with signs all over it and I figured I'd stand in front of it for kicks. I was tackled within seconds by a chick yelling "WHY ARE YOU STANDING IN FRONT OF THE CAR." These people have no sense of irony. You can't make this **** up." indeed the irony.
Though I thought slvt walks on a whole were described better in this article http://www.therebel.media/what_i_saw_at_vancouver_...
"was really about misandry. Misandry is defined as a hatred of men by Merriam-Webster. How do I know the agenda was anti-male? Because all of the speakers and attendees at the event espoused:
· Lies about a rape culture in the west.
· The paranoid belief that many or all men are rapists.
· The insane belief that females are being victimized left and right by men.
· An aggressive, ideological insistence to play speech police by wanting to outlaw certain words (like “rape,” for instance.)"
“During their “motivational” speeches, not one time did these radical feminists mention the real rape culture that exists in such third-world cesspools like Africa or Arab countries”
“third-wave feminists at events like this don’t care about women, but only about naked power by making relentless, false allegations of victimization and misogyny in the west…in the hopes of imposing their man-hating agenda on society.”
So what is the feminist opinion of **** walks? http://www.amberroseslutwalk.com/
Apparently one man told a crowd of men to prevent being raped should not dress likes **** which obviously is a stupid thing to say but this one man and one thing he said sparkled the **** walk? Because of this one man and things he said people needed to go up against “sexual injustice, victim blaming, derogatory labeling and gender inequality.” because one man saying something is gender inequality because one nobody man has made every woman in the west oppressed?
So they go against these things by saying misandry and behaving like chimpazees makes sense right because behaving unevolved will “NO MORE SEXUAL VIOLENCE
NO MORE VICTIM BLAMING
NO MORE DEROGATORY LABELS
NO MORE GENDER INEQUALITY”
one man managed to oppress all western women and yelling lies and hate about men while naked and where that one guy likely isn’t makes sense.
Though I guess it’s always been a problem that why it was organised long before this one man and so he has no importance to cite because it’s everywhere and always has been.
I would that the fact that 1 in 4 women have been raped themselves therefore they would know 1 in every 4 female friend or relative that has been raped yet majority of them
don't seem to give a **** about **** walks. Maybe it's because they are so oppressed they don't understand how traumatic or violating it was when they were raped despite the fact many women not just rape victims fear being outside alone at night due to the high risk of being raped that the media and feminists are telling them All in all **** walks do not and will never result in what they say it will, it's justifications are shaky and all it does achieve is to provide an area to spread man hate
behave like chimpanzees, spread fear and be a public nuisance and I'm sure nudity in public is illegal along with public nuisance (blocking a road) and get a free pass for it.
3 Answers
- .Jerry.Lv 75 years agoFavourite answer
"Slvtwalk in Vancouver 2016? thoughts?"
The way slvtwalks developed is typical of all modern-day feminist programs. ONE female student became offended when a police officer was giving a lecture on how women can minimise the opportunity of becoming a sexual assault victim. This older gentlemen broke from the script to provide fatherly advice, but in the process, gave the advice that women should avoid "dressing like slvts".
Naturally, this had become unacceptable since his generation. It was a dumb thing to say, and he should have been taken aside by the offended woman and educated on the acceptable methods of today. INSTEAD, the offended female ran to her women's studies department where they latched onto the police officers words as "evidence" of a culture that shames women who choose to dress provocatively. We can rest assured that the lesson this police officer learned, as well as ANYBODY else who was ever thinking about volunteering their time to help others in these similar situations, is that they might think twice before putting themselves out their to be bashed when they make a simple mistake of judgement.
Slvtwalks, of course are perpetuated by the radical feminists who believe that their shameful displays of near public nudity around children are acceptable while using the word "slvt" in it's historically correct term makes one guilty of a shameful crime. They are also used to promote radical feminist agenda's such as the "rape culture" in the West nonsense.
Radical feminists run with these ideas in any shameful way they choose, and the mainstream feminist movement has nothing to day about them. They don't distance themselves from these radicals, and do not criticized them in any way whatsoever. This is what feminism looks like today.
.
