Yahoo Answers is shutting down on 4 May 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

What can you tell me about this graph; origin, data used etc?

https://s.yimg.com/tr/i/6fddee072537464ca80538d6bf...

I did try to include more info, but the question ghosted! Still seems to be a problem here ...

Update:

Please note:  I am NOT questioning its authenticity; indeed, it appears in one of my old uni textbooks that was published around 1990.  

  

When it appears on THIS site, it is normally used to suggest something like, the current warming is nothing unusual, or that today's data has been tampered with, either to exaggerate the current warming, or to get rid of the Little Ice Age or Medieval Warm Period. 

Update 2:

Well, looking at the graph, the baseline appears to be temps around the start of the 20th century, with the final data point around 1970 or so. The start of the industrial revolution was around 0.25C lower, the coolest part of the LIA about 0.75C cooler, and the MWP around 0.75C warmer.  

 

So not too different to what we understand today, as far as I'm aware.  Would you agree?  

Update 3:

So what are the origins of the graph?   

   

On what data was it based?   

   

Was it a GLOBAL reconstruction?   

   

What would a modern graph, including data for the 50 or so years since then; What would that graph look like?   

   

Any other observations or comments?   

   

Thanks in anticipation ...

3 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 year ago

    Looks like it was done on the bus on the way to school

  • JimZ
    Lv 7
    1 year ago

    It is crude and I remember seeing it long ago.  It is what scientists believed the climate was before trillions of dollars were affected in it being otherwise.  Mann exaggerated and lied to rid the history of the medieval warm period.   I refuse to suggest he simply made honest mistakes.  It earned him fame and fortune far beyond what his shoddy work should have earned him.  He is a Charlatan and a fake and he has a lot of company.  

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.