Yahoo Answers is shutting down on 4 May 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Have Democrats gone full Orwellian now?
Democrats want to expand the court to 13 Justices and fill those new openings with partisans. That's called "packing the court."
Yesterday, while speaking in favor of that, Democrat Congressman Jerry Nadler said, "We’re not packing the Supreme Court, we’re unpacking it."
In Nadler's logic, Trump using his Constitutional power of appointing replacements for justices who died was "packing the court" and what the Dems are doing is "unpacking."
Do Democrats think anyone honestly believes their BS?
FYI - Democrats already had their payback for McConnell denying Garland a vote. It was their attempt to destroy Kavanaugh with false sexual assault accusations.
9 Answers
- SandyLv 71 week agoFavourite answer
Dems think everything they say is gospel. they're delusional like that. and what about propriety and manners. was that that loudmouth Waters who told Sen. Jordan to "shut up!" Since the Dems have the WH and Congress, they are going ape **** crazy to pass all their socialist agendas. America will be politically unrecognizable by the end of the year.
- Anonymous1 week ago
But it was ok when you appointed Barrett in the last days of trump’s presidency but wouldn’t let the Democrats the same with Garland during Obama’s last term. Just like when you win an election there’s no voter ‘fraud’ but when a Democrat wins an election it was ‘stolen’ and you react by trying to overthrow the government. I’ve seen 2 year olds who take more responsibility and accountability for their shortcomings and failures than you people do.
- Anonymous1 week ago
GOP blocks Obama's Supreme Court appointee hearings say it was an election year. GOP weeks from the 2020 election they rush through Amy Barret as Supreme Court Justice. Tell me more horseshit Penny
- Not YouLv 61 week ago
I like how you tried to get out of the clear hypocrisy on your side. Just admit that you expect wildly different standards based on who is currently in power.
Denies Garland a vote because it was an election year, rushes the appointment of ACB because they were about to lose an election.
Face it, we can do whatever we want to the court, and you have no room to complain.
- ?Lv 51 week ago
God you guys are drama queen, snowflakes. Expanding it to 13 is not going to happen - just an idea planted by a few.
- Anonymous1 week ago
I think you understand this is payback for Mitch McConnell blocking Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland. That wasn't a situation where the Senate refused to confirm Garland. McConnell refused to even allow a hearing on the matter.
Don't dish it out of you can't take it.