Yahoo Answers is shutting down on 4 May 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
?
I give no-nonsense advice, and I'm sorry if it's not what you want to hear. But it's better to hear the blunt truth from a stranger than a loved one. It's good for you! And I don't like cowards who block opinions they don't like, especially on political boards. You can't learn that way.
Are the elected democrats still in 2nd grade? Singing "na na hey hey goodbye" on the floor?
It cracks me up, the immaturity of the entire party. I don't know how any self-respecting democrat (if such a thing exists) can show their face.
Why no outrage from the liberals about this? I know I'd be embarrassed as hell if Republicans acted like 13 year olds and started chanting like that ON THE FLOOR of congress.
The liberals never cease to find ways to make me think less of them.
5 AnswersPolitics4 years agoWhen did Democrats go from "Shutting down the government is not what the American people deserve." to "if we don't get our way,?
we will shut down the government"?
It's funny how their hypocrisy shines through, brighter than anything, and their minions just defend whatever they say or do, never bothered by this.
6 AnswersPolitics4 years agoWhy do Americans think they can have children they can't afford, and then when they can't afford health care, they blame other people?
I'm apparently heartless for thinking that the government should not provide health care for everyone, and that I don't know what it's like living paycheck to paycheck.
A single person with a roommate can live on minimum wage. It's choices people made, prioritizing what they WANT that put them in a situation they can't afford, and now anyone who doesn't think that we should all chip in to pay for their health care is selfish?
Is this what liberal "logic" is in 2017?
5 AnswersPolitics4 years agoWhy are most politicians and all liberals unable to understand that a pre-existing condition clause makes any health care bill unworkable?
Yes, I understand it feels good to try and include everyone, but the simple fact is that marketplace can't work if we allow people to get insurance after they get sick. How much do you think auto insurance would cost if you only got it after a crash? Homeowners insurance if you only got it after a fire or catastrophic loss?
Everyone seems to understand this, yet when it comes to health care, they seem to have a blind spot. IT CAN'T WORK. If you want more people covered, then we need to teach personal responsibility BEFORE you get sick, AND bite the bullet when it comes to covering people who made the choice not to get coverage. It sucks. And yes, it SOUNDS mean, but it isn't. It is what will enable millions more people to afford reasonable coverage.
8 AnswersPolitics4 years agoCan the Democrats that truly understand that illegal immigrants are criminals and should be treated as such, and Republicans that truly?
understand that religion belongs in the home, not in schools or government buildings form a "common sense" party?
3 AnswersPolitics4 years agoWhy do liberals seem to be trying so hard to get rid of Trump? Do they not know how good they have it?
Can you imagine what liberals would do if it was Pence or Ryan? Be careful what you wish for.
12 AnswersPolitics4 years agoWhy is there still a hollywood double standard when it comes to political correctness? Halle Berry said in a pre-oscar interview?
that she was rooting for another "woman of color" to win the award she was presenting.
Can you imagine the uproar if a WHITE person said they were hoping a white person won the award?! What a racist that person would have to be.
But today, not one peep about Berry's comment. Just talk about her hair and her dress.
But no, the liberal media isn't composed of hypocrites, is it? LOL
5 AnswersPolitics4 years agoWhy does Obama think he knows better than lawmakers and courts? One of his many commuted sentences already back in jail after buying coke.?
http://nypost.com/2017/02/06/drug-dealer-whose-sen...
Great. We caught ONE. I wonder how many others are back out there peddling drugs. It really makes you wonder whose side Obama was really on.
It's a tough call when you think about it. Drug dealers, or the kids he's trying to hook on drugs? I understand why it's such a difficult choice.
5 AnswersPolitics4 years agoDoes anyone else wish Hollywood Liberals would speak up more about politics? It's very important to know what these largely uneducated?
(outside "theater" majors) folks think about the issues of the day. Don't they know we live to hear their tweets so we know how to live our daily lives? What can we do to encourage them to share their brilliance?
6 AnswersPolitics4 years agoPelosi has been blaming Bush for so long, she can't switch to "Trump"! Or does she really not know who is president now?
'President Bush'
By Brent Scher Published February 07, 2017 Washington Free Beacon
Facebook Twitter livefyre Email Print
Feb. 2, 2017: House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of Calif. responds to questions about President Donald Trump's actions and agenda, during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington.
Feb. 2, 2017: House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of Calif. responds to questions about President Donald Trump's actions and agenda, during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP)
A day after House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., was grilled by "Meet The Press" host Chuck Todd on whether her party's leadership was out of touch with the current political climate, the nearly three-decade veteran of Congress mistakenly referred to President Trump as "President Bush."
"While it's only been a couple of weeks since the inauguration, we've seen nothing that I can work with President Bush on," Pelosi said during a Monday press conference.
It appears that members standing behind Pelosi noticed the mistake but chose not to correct or interrupt her. It remains unclear, however, exactly which "President Bush" the minority leader was referring to.
2 AnswersPolitics4 years agoIsn't it funny that if the Federal Government cuts funding to sanctuary cities, liberals will blame the government for cutting services?
rather than themselves.
The cities are violating federal law, but when you punish them for it, they take no responsibility for WHY they are being punished.
These liberal mayors seem like 14 year-olds that don't understand the consequences of their actions.
Is this because under 8 years of Obama there WERE no consequences for ignoring federal laws, since he encouraged it?
8 AnswersPolitics4 years agoIf some liberal idiot tries to blow up the White House, should Madonna be arrested as a co-conspirator? Or?
should she have already been arrested?
6 AnswersPolitics4 years agoWhy are the liberals who aren't rioting calling out these violent thug protestors? What would they like the police they are attacking to?
do? Allow a riot? These guys are trying to do their job and now at least 3 police have been hospitalized.
They are a disgrace and I wouldn't object if the police gave a 1 minute warning and then fired at anyone still rioting.
Black lives matter. Police lives matter. Violent thug lives don't matter to me.
5 AnswersPolitics4 years agoIt seems there is a common pattern. A president who is elected gets a strong advantage toward being reelected, but after 2 terms, the?
country wants a different party in charge. This pattern repeats over and over. 2 terms of Obama (D) followed by (R) Same for Bush II. Same for Clinton Reagan's success I guess broke the pattern for one term, as did Carter's failure. Nixon elected to 2 terms followed by (D) Kennedy elected to 2 terms followed by (R) Eisenhower elected twice followed by (D) This goes all the way back until there were no term limits. So is it that neither party can keep the country happy for long? Is it that once a president is elected, he has an unfair advantage toward reelection? Is it that the desire for change is stronger than the desire to stay in power, so more people are motivated to vote after 2 terms of a president they don't like from the other party? Maybe we should switch to one 6 year term. The first year is a learning curve. The last year is campaigning. Maybe the country would be better served with a different format. What do you think?
1 AnswerPolitics4 years agoIt seems there is a common pattern. A president who is elected gets a strong advantage toward being reelected, but after 2 terms, the?
country wants a different party in charge. This pattern repeats over and over. 2 terms of Obama (D) followed by (R) Same for Bush II. Same for Clinton Reagan's success I guess broke the pattern for one term, as did Carter's failure. Nixon elected to 2 terms followed by (D) Kennedy elected to 2 terms followed by (R) Eisenhower elected twice followed by (D) This goes all the way back until there were no term limits. So is it that neither party can keep the country happy for long? Is it that once a president is elected, he has an unfair advantage toward reelection? Is it that the desire for change is stronger than the desire to stay in power, so more people are motivated to vote after 2 terms of a president they don't like from the other party? Maybe we should switch to one 6 year term. The first year is a learning curve. The last year is campaigning. Maybe the country would be better served with a different format. What do you think?
4 AnswersElections4 years agoIt seems there is a common pattern. A president who is elected gets a strong advantage toward being reelected, but after 2 terms, the?
country wants a different party in charge.
This pattern repeats over and over.
2 terms of Obama (D) followed by (R)
Same for Bush II.
Same for Clinton
Reagan's success I guess broke the pattern for one term, as did Carter's failure.
Nixon elected to 2 terms followed by (D)
Kennedy elected to 2 terms followed by (R)
Eisenhower elected twice followed by (D)
This goes all the way back until there were no term limits.
So is it that neither party can keep the country happy for long?
Is it that once a president is elected, he has an unfair advantage toward reelection?
Is it that the desire for change is stronger than the desire to stay in power, so more people are motivated to vote after 2 terms of a president they don't like from the other party?
Maybe we should switch to one 6 year term. The first year is a learning curve. The last year is campaigning. Maybe the country would be better served with a different format.
What do you think?
1 AnswerElections4 years agoWhen will liberals start doing what they said we should all do, and get behind the president? They also claimed obstruction was a horrible?
thing, yet I see many democrats saying they will do whatever they can to stop Trump.
So where is the liberal outrage, or do they proudly wear the badge of "Biggest Hypocrites on the Planet"?
5 AnswersPolitics4 years ago