Obama states that McCain has the negative commercials. Yet Obama has spent 3x what McCain has on negative ads!?

For Obama the truth is relative or maybe irrelevant. If he says it it has to be true right? He is a Harvard educated carpetbagger, he knows better than any of us laymen right.

All hail King Obama...

McCain has given up and should retire to a retirement village in Florida. I thought McCain would blow Obama out of the water due to the fact Obama has many vulnerabilities that can be easily drawn on. Instead McCain has rolled over like a dog getting its belly rubbed.

My biggest fear right now is an Obama victory will lay the foundation for another 12 - 16 years of extreme ultra conservative misdirected and dangerous policies from the Republican Party. Any doubts that take a look at what the history that brought in the second worst president of all time, Ronald Reagan, and also looked what happened what caused the Republican wins in '94.

Nice try, Bunkie. Of course, that's a bit of sophistry on your part since even if your figures were accurate, it wouldn't necessarily mean that Obama had put out MORE negative ads, which is obviously NOT the case to anyone who has been following this election campaign.

It simply means that the FEWER negative ads that Obama did place (and they were MUCH FEWER) simply COST MORE. Nice try though. I think you've forgotten that Obama supporters tend to be less gullible than McCain supporters, so your little mathematical games aren't too tough for us to see through.

And you really expect us to believe you're NOT a McPalin supporter? You know you ain't gonna be writing in no "Foghorn Leghorn" on Election Day. You're a McPalin pal all the way, obviously.

HAVE you not heard a Robo call

have you not heard ads about terrorist

Have you not seen flyer's on terrorist

Have you not seen ads saying Obama wants to teach sex to babies

have you not seen ads about his in correct senate record

Have you not seen all the truths spun and lines left out of entire context

All pointing to Obama

There are negative ads and here are true negative ads

and Obama is using policy's and issues not scare tactics like the Mc Cain camp

They are smart to not allow ANY thing go by without immediate response

Why.....lessons learnt from the past and tables have turned and Obama has played the game well considering all that has been tossed at him

Obama has spent more because he CAN...with his millions of small donors sending him money for past two years and some large donors and could not happen to a nicer guy

lol

Possibly demos have more $ to spend on ads to repsond to the mesh of negative ads by the McCain ensamble. When you are losing and your slogans have not caught the majority of the voters, you must throw everything possible at the opponent. It worked last time for Bush who swift boated Kerry. Then papa Bush used the Willy Horton ads to make people think Dukasis was soft on crime. So now, throw it all out, terrorist, socialist, liberal, community worker, deals with enemies, taxes will go up; hopefully uneducated voters will buy some of these false charges. Obama just throws out simply that McCain stuck with Bush 90% of the time. This has worked well for Obama.

McCain's adds for awhile were 100% negative ads when only 1/3 of Obama's adds were negative at this same time. Monetarily speaking Obama has spent more on ads because he has had a unprecedented amount of donations coming in unlike McCain. So essentially Obama has tons more money to spend on any ads all together.

Obama spent lot more in general since he has much much more money. He was pointing at certain period during campaign which McCain camp ran mostly negative ads. I don't know why its such big deal. Campaign is full of stretch, distortion of facts in every which way by both camps. But polls did indicate McCain's negative ads did alienate some voters. So Obama isn't entirely off on the subject.

Proportionally, Mccain has more negative ads.

Although, because of Obama's large lead in donations, he has actually run more.

Political statements from campaigns are always misleading, from both sides.

it truly is the only component Obama (the agent of exchange) can win at. Obama is the main unfavourable and divisive presidential candidate in generations. To Obama's credit, he's in basic terms doing what his handlers tell him to do.

It is so amazing to me that people zero in on issues that don't matter for squat.

How about High Crimes and all that mess coming down from the top. I wonder about all these firms who have been loaded into the dog-pile of people getting money from the average tax payer.

How about continual violations of the Bill of Rights and Constitution by those who were elected to uphold it, i wonder.

Stuff is upside down